Cryptographic posture management

See the cryptography your business
runs on.

Qinsight Atlas turns scattered cryptographic signals into a connected, evidence-backed view of the systems, data and dependencies your organization must protect, prioritize and migrate.

Plan a discovery pilot
Explore the platform
Qinsight Atlas dashboard: cryptographic posture score, posture over time against governed coverage, and one priority exposure traced from business service to algorithm
TRACE EVERY FINDING
Map source, owner, and business context
TRACK POSTURE OVER TIME
Measure crypto risks over time
The visibility gap

Every digital interaction has cryptography underneath it. Most organizations still manage that foundation as fragments.

Certificates sit in one tool. Libraries sit in code. Protocol behavior is observed somewhere else. Ownership lives in a CMDB, or in someone's head. A spreadsheet can list objects; it cannot explain the estate.

2030
112-bit classical strength deprecated

The NIST IR 8547 draft proposes deprecating 112-bit classical security, including RSA-2048, after 2030, and disallowing it after 2035.

10+
yrs
Long-lived data can outlast cryptography

When confidentiality must hold longer than the cryptography protecting it, harvest-now-decrypt-later becomes a present-tense problem.

Multi
-year
Enterprise migration horizon

Discovery, pilots, dependency mapping and staged rollout. The schedule is set by your estate, not by a prediction.

A better operating model

From hidden signals to migration-ready context

Each stage produces evidence the next stage can trust.

01

Collect

Network observations, infrastructure APIs, code analysis, files, KMS metadata and imported CBOMs.

02

Normalize

Canonical objects without losing provenance. One key seen three times is one key.

03

Correlate

Relationships, ownership and dependencies. What breaks when this changes?

04

Assess

Findings with context, evidence and stated uncertainty.

05

Report

Operational and executive evidence, exportable and defensible.

Evidence over assertion

A posture you can explain, not just display

Every useful answer should be traceable to a source, an observation, a relationship and a point in time. That is what separates an enterprise system of record from a dashboard.

The first principle

Honest about gaps

Expose missing context and incomplete coverage instead of turning uncertainty into false certainty. An inventory that hides what it could not see is an inventory nobody can sign off on.

Source-aware

Provenance stays attached

Keep the collection method, scope and evidence on every observation. A record without provenance cannot be defended.

Context-connected

Objects become decisions

Relate technical objects to deployed systems, owners and business services. An algorithm alone is not a decision.

Time-conscious

History is half the record

Preserve first seen, last observed, drift and conflict history. Current state alone tells you nothing about direction.

One estate · many decisions

Give every stakeholder the view their decision requires

One record can answer technical, operational, risk and executive questions without creating four competing inventories.

Who is asking
The question they bring
What the record returns
CISO
Where are our most consequential blind spots?
Coverage and readiness
Cryptography / PKI
Which objects, parameters and trust chains need attention?
Technical evidence
Application owner
What depends on this change, and what could break?
Dependency context
Risk / audit
What supports this conclusion, and when was it observed?
Traceable rationale
Capabilities

Where to start

Cryptographic discovery

See across every surface, network, cloud, code, files, keys and imported evidence.

This is some text
This is some text
This is some text
Explore coverage →

Inventory & CBOM

Create a living system of record with relationships, owners and observation history.

This is some text
This is some text
See the record →

Risk assessment

Make prioritization explainable before it becomes a score.

This is some text
This is some text
This is some text
Review the approach →

Quantum readiness

Understand the regulatory schedule and build an evidence baseline against it.

This is some text
This is some text
This is some text
See the timeline →
By industry

Regulated estates, different constraints

The cryptography is similar everywhere. What differs is data lifetime, change tolerance and who is asking for evidence.

Financial services

Payments, identity, markets and core systems, with dependencies that cross counterparty boundaries.

G7 CEG
DORA
PCI DSS 4.0
Explore the estate →

Government & defense

Federal acquisition and national-security requirements are making cryptographic readiness a near-term procurement issue for agencies and suppliers.

CNSSP 15
EO 14412
OMB M-26-15
See the mandates →

Healthcare & life sciences

Data with retention horizons measured in decades, inside validated systems that resist change by design.

HIPAA
21 CFR Part 11
EU MDR
See the lifetime gap →

Critical infrastructure

Assets built to run for thirty years, where availability outranks confidentiality and active scanning is often prohibited.

NERC CIP
NIS2
IEC 62443
See OT constraints →
Common questions

Cryptographic posture management, explained

Clear answers to the questions security, infrastructure and risk leaders ask before they trust a cryptographic discovery program.

01
What is cryptographic posture management?
02
What is a CBOM?
03
Does Qinsight store private keys?
04
How is quantum readiness measured without predicting Q-day?
05
How does the inventory reach the tools our teams already use?
06
Do you automate certificate lifecycle management?

Know what protects your business. Prepare it for what comes next.

Prove it in one environment. Leave with a record an auditor can check.